Reviews of SignalForge
4.0(4)- 5.0(1)Kwame M. · 7 Oct 2026
Timing finally matches our outbound
Used for: Weekly outbound to accounts with a recent hiring signal in Clay.
Works well: Signals land as rows, so there is nothing to scrape. Reply rate on signal-based lists was clearly higher than on static lists.
Could be better: CRM sync is only on the Team plan, which we needed.
Proof of use checkedClayHubSpotReply from SignalForge
Thank you for the detailed feedback. We have noted the limits you mention and will share changes on the product page.
- 4.0(1)Yuki T. · 3 Oct 2026
Good signals, light on history
Used for: Funding and job-change signals for a mid-market list.
Works well: Setup took an afternoon and the scoring rules are easy to read.
Could be better: Signal history is limited to 90 days.
Reviewer got free access - 4.0(1)Sofia M. · 29 Sept 2026
Does what it says
Used for: Slack alerts for new hiring spikes.
Works well: Free plan was enough to test it properly.
Could be better: Hourly signals need Pro.
- 3.0(1)Jordan R. · 25 Sept 2026
Useful, but pricing climbs
Used for: A 3,000 account list across two teams.
Works well: The Clay integration works well.
Could be better: Costs rise quickly once you add seats.